The most comprehensive bank Interview Answer Review tooling available online.

In the Meraki integration project, the supply chain process required significant optimization of the entire flow. To achieve this, most of the shipping-related process needed to be modified. However, the team lacked sufficient time to complete the work because the planned use of an adapter did not work, requiring me to redesign the flow.

With limited time remaining before system integration testing (SIT), the cross-functional teams and other tracks were ready to test their code, and management was unwilling to postpone SIT and Cycle 1 testing. Since there was an additional round of SIT and Cycle 2 testing planned, I decided to proceed with the changes that the team had already completed. We migrated the completed code to the test instance and communicated that only Phase 1 of the changes would be released initially, while the remaining changes would be delivered during Cycle 2 testing.

I ensured the Phase 1 delivery was designed to avoid impacting the end-to-end flow, allowing the other teams to proceed with testing their portions of the code. This approach ensured that other teams' deadlines were not affected. I also informed the cross-functional teams that the OTM and GTM changes were completed, and the remaining shipping-related code optimization would be delivered before Cycle 2 testing, along with the next round of SIT.

By taking this approach, I ensured that complete testing was not impacted and that the project stayed on track.

i was head of events in a student activity called aces and it was a magnificent experience as i gathered a team wich i chose by myself and my partner as they all were hardworkers and creative thinkers of course we had some trouble with them as some of them were being lazy about doing there tasks or procranstinating but we were able to motivate them each time so they would give their best

Usually in one's career sometimes they are asked to work on somehting which they are not motivated to work for and it's not as challenging as other projects. Then I usually try to align the work they doing to not what I or compnay would gain form it rather what is their benefits from it. Also, at teh same time acknowledging the downsides of that project like it;s legacy systems and may not give them greenfield field projects opportunities for you but they are bread and butter and their continuity is important and  usually these projects generate better impact which is were performance reviews are very helpful 

• Self-Motivated: I thrive on challenges and take initiative to learn and grow without external prompts.

• Passion for Exploration: I love exploring new places, immersing myself in diverse environments, and gaining fresh perspectives.

• People-Centric: I enjoy engaging with new people, building connections, and exchanging ideas.

• Mentorship: Mentoring others is something I genuinely enjoy, as it allows me to share knowledge and help others grow.

• Appreciation for Art and Culture: I have a deep love for art, culture, music, and world cinema, which enriches my creativity and worldview.

• Cooking Enthusiast: I love experimenting in the kitchen and trying out new dishes, blending culinary skills with creativity.

As a QA leader I had to choose between run a full check of a new functionality that wasnt very popular or use or let the change pass over with the aprove of the PM for some time saving. I choose run the full check, take a few days more, but when the functionality goes to production it works well, without any bugs.