Anonymous
My team was preparing for a critical release of a new feature in our SDK,
which was crucial for upcoming business use cases involving personally identifiable information (PII).
Shortly before the release, a partner team reported a high-priority production incident: their application instance was crashing due to high memory usage, which they attributed to our SDK.
Despite our investigation revealing no inherent issues with our SDK,
the VPs and other senior leaders were concerned about the stability of our software.
My manager decided to delay the planned release due to the recent incident, a decision supported by most of the team who were wary of further issues.
I reviewed the incident details and suggested that restarting the partner team's application instance might alleviate the problem.
This recommendation was implemented during the incident call, and it resolved the issue,
indicating that the problem was not with our SDK but potentially with the partner’s application.
Understanding the urgency of the release, I presented a case to the VPs highlighting that the release was fully developed, tested, and ready.
I emphasized its importance for business use cases and the fact that customer expectations were high.
I proposed a controlled rollout approach to mitigate any risk, where we would monitor the release closely
and be prepared to address any unforeseen issues promptly.
Despite initial resistance, my recommendation to proceed with the release was accepted.
The deployment went smoothly, and the new feature was well-received by customers, significantly advancing our business objectives related to PII.
The decision to proceed, even amidst the recent concerns, demonstrated our commitment to delivering value while managing risk effectively.
It also reinforced the team’s confidence in balancing operational stability with strategic priorities.