Product Execution

How would you prioritize resources when you have two important things to do but can't do them both?

Product Manager

Duck Creek Technologies

Calm

Aetna

SeatGeek

Hired

Wayfair

Did you come across this question in an interview?

Answers

Expert Answer

Anonymous

5Exceptional
When faced with two important tasks and limited resources, the decision on how to prioritize comes down to a structured approach that considers impact, urgency, alignment with strategic goals, and resource availability. Here’s how I would handle this situation:

1. Assess the Impact:

  • Evaluate the potential impact of each task on the business or project goals. Consider which task will deliver the most significant benefit or mitigate the most substantial risk. For example, if one task will directly contribute to a major revenue increase or customer satisfaction, it might take precedence.
  • Long-term vs. Short-term Impact: Determine whether the impact is immediate or will build value over time. Balancing short-term wins with long-term gains is crucial in resource allocation.

2. Consider the Urgency:

  • Deadlines and Dependencies: Check if there are any hard deadlines or dependencies tied to each task. A task with an imminent deadline or one that is a dependency for other critical work may need to be prioritized.
  • Opportunity Cost: Consider what will be lost by delaying one task over the other. Sometimes the cost of inaction on one task can outweigh the benefits of completing the other.

3. Align with Strategic Goals:

  • Strategic Importance: Align the tasks with the broader strategic goals of the organization. If one task directly supports a key business objective or strategic initiative, it may warrant higher priority.
  • Stakeholder Expectations: Consider the expectations of key stakeholders. If one task is a priority for executive leadership or a critical customer, that might influence the decision.

4. Resource Allocation:

  • Team Strengths and Expertise: Determine which task best aligns with the strengths and expertise of the available team members. If one task requires specialized knowledge that your team possesses, it might be more efficient to allocate resources there.
  • Resource Flexibility: Assess whether resources can be reallocated or whether some aspects of the tasks can be outsourced or delegated. This might allow both tasks to progress simultaneously, even if one gets more focus.

5. Make a Decision and Communicate:

  • Choose the Task with the Greatest Overall Benefit: After evaluating all factors, select the task that offers the most value considering impact, urgency, alignment with strategy, and available resources.
  • Clear Communication: Once a decision is made, communicate it clearly to all relevant stakeholders. Explain the rationale behind the prioritization to ensure transparency and maintain trust.

6. Monitor and Adjust:

  • Continuous Evaluation: The situation may change as new information emerges or as progress is made. Regularly review the status of both tasks and adjust priorities if necessary. Stay flexible and ready to pivot if the context demands it.

Example in Practice:

If I had to choose between launching a new feature that is highly anticipated by users and fixing a critical bug that is causing customer churn, I would:
  • Assess the urgency: The bug fix might take precedence if it's directly affecting user retention and revenue.
  • Evaluate the impact: The feature launch could be postponed if the bug fix is more critical to maintaining customer trust and satisfaction.
  • Align with strategy: If the company's strategy is focused on growth and customer experience, fixing the bug aligns better with those goals.
  • Communicate: I would communicate the decision to focus on the bug fix, explaining the reasoning to stakeholders and setting expectations for the feature launch timeline.
By following this structured approach, I ensure that resources are allocated in a way that maximizes value and aligns with the broader goals of the organization.

Anonymous

4.2Exceptional
I'd consider the following factors:
  • Is the team's readiness to start on one item greater than the other?
  • Is there more urgency to deliver on item over another?
  • How does the scheduling of the items impact customer value? i.e. does delaying one eliminate its value due to a temporal event, like a holiday or contract expiration?
  • I'd gather input from stakeholders such as design, leadership, customer success, and engineering to understand their opinion on prioritization
  • What user base does each benefit, and which is more important to us/closer to revenue impact?
  • Is there greater risk in either item?
Given the outcome of these questions, I should have enough information to make a choice. If not, then I would have a bias for action and choose to tackle whichever project can deliver the fastest.

Anonymous

4Strong
I would analyze the following for each of the tasks at hand
  • I would first evaluate if there are alternative solutions to temporarily address one task. A quick fix might free up the resources to completely focus on the next task and reduce urgency on this task
  • I would evaluate to see if one task can be broken down further and still be able to deliver value to the customer. For Example - deliver functionality over trendy user interface
  • I would assess potential risks on business metrics if the tasks are not delivered - revenue, retention rate, operational efficiency
  • I would evaluate the team expertise and identify if there is anyone with a higher expertise level who can help expedite on one task
Once I have gathered this information, I will prioritize the tasks based on my assessment on impact on business goals and customer outcomes. Throughout this process I ensure transparent communication with the stakeholders, aligning their expectations and ensure that the team understands the rationale behind the decision.
I have handled several such situations. For example - I had to choose between an important feature update and a performance issue affecting all users. By assessing the risks and leveraging team’s expertise, we delivered a partial feature update while simultaneously fixing the performance issue. This approach ensured we addressed immediate concerns without losing sight of broader goals.
  • How would you prioritize resources when you have two important things to do but can't do them both?
  • When you have two important things to do but can't do them both at the same time, how would you prioritize your resources?
  • In a situation when you can't handle two important tasks simultaneously, how do you prioritize resources?
  • In case you have two important tasks that can't be accomplished simultaneously, how would you prioritize your resources?
  • You have two important tasks to do, but you can't do both. How do you prioritize resources?
  • How would you prioritize your resources if there were two things you needed to do, but you were unable to do both at the same time?
  • How can you prioritize resources when you have two important tasks to complete but can't accomplish both?
  • In situations where you have a choice between two important things, but cannot do both at the same time, how would you prioritize?
Try Our AI Interviewer

Prepare for success with realistic, role-specific interview simulations.

Try AI Interview Now

Interview question asked to Product Managers interviewing at Fortinet, Marchex, Adobe and others: How would you prioritize resources when you have two important things to do but can't do them both?.