How would you prioritize resources when you have two important things to do but can't do them both?

Question

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

When faced with two important tasks and limited resources, the decision on how
to prioritize comes down to a structured approach that considers impact,
urgency, alignment with strategic goals, and resource availability. Here’s how I
would handle this situation:

1. ASSESS THE IMPACT:

* Evaluate the potential impact of each task on the business or project goals.
   Consider which task will deliver the most significant benefit or mitigate the
   most substantial risk. For example, if one task will directly contribute to a
   major revenue increase or customer satisfaction, it might take precedence.
 * Long-term vs. Short-term Impact: Determine whether the impact is immediate or
   will build value over time. Balancing short-term wins with long-term gains is
   crucial in resource allocation.

2. CONSIDER THE URGENCY:

* Deadlines and Dependencies: Check if there are any hard deadlines or
   dependencies tied to each task. A task with an imminent deadline or one that
   is a dependency for other critical work may need to be prioritized.
 * Opportunity Cost: Consider what will be lost by delaying one task over the
   other. Sometimes the cost of inaction on one task can outweigh the benefits
   of completing the other.

3. ALIGN WITH STRATEGIC GOALS:

* Strategic Importance: Align the tasks with the broader strategic goals of the
   organization. If one task directly supports a key business objective or
   strategic initiative, it may warrant higher priority.
 * Stakeholder Expectations: Consider the expectations of key stakeholders. If
   one task is a priority for executive leadership or a critical customer, that
   might influence the decision.

4. RESOURCE ALLOCATION:

* Team Strengths and Expertise: Determine which task best aligns with the
   strengths and expertise of the available team members. If one task requires
   specialized knowledge that your team possesses, it might be more efficient to
   allocate resources there.
 * Resource Flexibility: Assess whether resources can be reallocated or whether
   some aspects of the tasks can be outsourced or delegated. This might allow
   both tasks to progress simultaneously, even if one gets more focus.

5. MAKE A DECISION AND COMMUNICATE:

* Choose the Task with the Greatest Overall Benefit: After evaluating all
   factors, select the task that offers the most value considering impact,
   urgency, alignment with strategy, and available resources.
 * Clear Communication: Once a decision is made, communicate it clearly to all
   relevant stakeholders. Explain the rationale behind the prioritization to
   ensure transparency and maintain trust.

6. MONITOR AND ADJUST:

* Continuous Evaluation: The situation may change as new information emerges or
   as progress is made. Regularly review the status of both tasks and adjust
   priorities if necessary. Stay flexible and ready to pivot if the context
   demands it.

EXAMPLE IN PRACTICE:

If I had to choose between launching a new feature that is highly anticipated by
users and fixing a critical bug that is causing customer churn, I would:
 * Assess the urgency: The bug fix might take precedence if it's directly
   affecting user retention and revenue.
 * Evaluate the impact: The feature launch could be postponed if the bug fix is
   more critical to maintaining customer trust and satisfaction.
 * Align with strategy: If the company's strategy is focused on growth and
   customer experience, fixing the bug aligns better with those goals.
 * Communicate: I would communicate the decision to focus on the bug fix,
   explaining the reasoning to stakeholders and setting expectations for the
   feature launch timeline.

By following this structured approach, I ensure that resources are allocated in
a way that maximizes value and aligns with the broader goals of the
organization.

Anonymous · Answer

I'd consider the following factors:
 * Is the team's readiness to start on one item greater than the other?
 * Is there more urgency to deliver on item over another?
 * How does the scheduling of the items impact customer value? i.e. does
   delaying one eliminate its value due to a temporal event, like a holiday or
   contract expiration?
 * I'd gather input from stakeholders such as design, leadership, customer
   success, and engineering to understand their opinion on prioritization
 * What user base does each benefit, and which is more important to us/closer to
   revenue impact?
 * Is there greater risk in either item?

Given the outcome of these questions, I should have enough information to make a
choice. If not, then I would have a bias for action and choose to tackle
whichever project can deliver the fastest.

How would you prioritize resources when you have two important things to do but can't do them both?

Answers