Tell me about a time when you got a performance rating you disagreed with.

Question

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

During my Data Analyst internship at Infolabs, I participated in a project where
I collaborated with a team of five to develop machine learning prototypes and
conduct large-scale data analyses. At the end of the project, each intern
received an evaluation from our direct supervisor. I was surprised to find that
my performance rating was lower than I expected, given the contributions I felt
I had made.
Task:
I wanted to understand the basis for the rating and felt it was important to
clarify any discrepancies between my self-assessment and the supervisor’s
perception. My goal was to maintain a positive relationship while advocating for
the work I had done.
Action:
I requested a brief, one-on-one meeting with my supervisor. In that meeting, I
calmly listened to their feedback to understand their perspective fully. Then, I
shared specific examples of my contributions:
 * How I had taken the lead on cleaning and preprocessing a particularly
   challenging dataset.
 * My involvement in training a machine learning model that boosted predictive
   accuracy by 57%.
 * The additional responsibilities I took on when another team member became
   unavailable.

I also provided the documentation and metrics I’d been tracking to illustrate
the impact of my work. By centering the conversation on factual evidence and
outcomes, I was able to highlight aspects of my contribution that might have
been overlooked initially.
Result:
After reviewing these points, my supervisor acknowledged that some of my
behind-the-scenes work wasn’t fully visible to them. They updated my performance
file to reflect my efforts more accurately, and we agreed to have more frequent
check-ins going forward. This experience taught me the value of proactive
communication and documentation, ensuring that both my manager and I have a
clear view of my responsibilities and achievements.

Anonymous · Answer

During my tenure at Cisco, I participated in a project where I collaborated with
a devops team and testing team to accomplish the resource allocation . At the
end of the project, each intern received an evaluation from our direct
supervisor. I was surprised to find that my performance rating was lower than I
expected, given the contributions I felt I had made.
Task:I wanted to understand the basis for the rating and felt it was important
to clarify any discrepancies between my self-assessment and the supervisor’s
perception. My goal was to maintain a positive relationship while advocating for
the work I had done.
Action:I requested a brief, one-on-one meeting with my supervisor. In that
meeting, I calmly listened to their feedback to understand their perspective
fully. Then, I shared specific examples of my contributions:
 * How I had taken the lead on documenting the current resource allocation and
   new resource allocation based on my experience.
 * My involvement in proper resource allocation resulted in 25% reduction of P1
   issues due to resource allocation.
 * The additional responsibilities I took on to get all resource approvals and
   helm script changes went unnoticed.

I also provided the documentation and metrics I’d been tracking to illustrate
the impact of my work. By centering the conversation on factual evidence and
outcomes, I was able to highlight aspects of my contribution that might have
been overlooked initially.
Result:After reviewing these points, my supervisor acknowledged that some of my
behind-the-scenes work wasn’t fully visible to them.  we agreed to have more
frequent check-ins going forward. This experience taught me the value of
proactive communication and documentation, ensuring that both my manager and I
have a clear view of my responsibilities and achievements.

Anonymous · Answer

I've worked for startups and haven't had a lot of formal performance reviews,
but when I worked for Verizon, I did get a "performing" rather than exceeding
expectations rating for one of my reviews. I'd been tasked with relaunching a
feature into a new product line, and as part of the execution of the relaunch we
hit a number of major snags with the data architecture of the core product. It
made the onboarding of the new product awkward and I pushed back on this quite a
lot, which was frustrating for my teammates in the core product. Upon
reflection, I'd have approached the shared data structure problem from a broader
perspective and asked for help positioning potential solutions that would work
for both our products.

Tell me about a time when you got a performance rating you disagreed with.

Practice this question with AI

Go Premium

Practice More Questions

Community Answers

Unlock Community Insights

Unlock Community Insights

Unlock Community Insights

Stop Winging It. Start Using Frameworks.