Let's say we have 6 columns of data. How would you compare the data of the first 3 columns with those of the last 3?
Walk me through the steps you would take to compare the data in the first 50% of the columns versus the data in the second 50%.
In your opinion, which set of data do you think is more significant: the first three columns or the last three, and why?
Imagine you were presenting this data to a group of stakeholders - how would you demonstrate the differences between the data in the first half of the columns versus the second half?
How would you quantify the variances in data between the first three columns compared to the last three?
If you were tasked with analyzing the trends between the data in each of the six columns, where would you start?
Walk me through a scenario where the data in the first three columns tells a different story than the data in the last three.
When analyzing this dataset, how would you ensure the accuracy of your comparison of the first 3 columns with the last 3?
If you noticed any outliers within the data on the first three columns, how would you adjust your analysis in comparison to the last three?
When it comes to analyzing this data, would you say the first half or the second half tells a more complete story, and why?
Could you share your thoughts on how you would analyze and compare the data from the first three columns against the data from the last three?