How do you handle situations of conflict in the workplace? You will inevitably face some of these at Apple - what methods have you found to be effective that you could apply here?

Question

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

I believe effective conflict resolution in the workplace requires a combination
of professional communication, emotional intelligence, and a solutions-oriented
mindset. Let me share my approach:
First, I always try to address conflicts early before they escalate. When I
notice tension or disagreement, I prefer to have a direct but respectful
conversation with the involved parties. I focus on:
 * Active listening - Understanding all perspectives without interrupting or
   making assumptions
 * Using "I" statements to express concerns without being accusatory
 * Remaining calm and professional, regardless of the situation's emotional
   intensity

For example, in my previous role, I had a disagreement with a team member about
project priorities. Instead of letting frustration build, I:
 * Scheduled a private meeting to discuss the issue
 * Asked questions to understand their perspective
 * Shared my viewpoint and concerns
 * Worked together to find a compromise that aligned with our team's goals

I also believe in:
 * Focusing on facts rather than emotions
 * Looking for common ground
 * Documenting agreements and follow-up actions
 * Involving management when necessary, but trying to resolve issues at the peer
   level first

I understand Apple's collaborative culture and high standards for excellence can
create situations where different viewpoints need to be reconciled. I'm
confident these conflict resolution skills would help me navigate such
challenges while maintaining positive working relationships and achieving team
objectives.

Anonymous · Answer

When there is a situation where two people have conflicts and are in deadlock,
then they are clearly  not seeing eye to eye on that specific topic and are
emotionally investedin their current solution and forgetting to look at bigger
picture. There is no one right answer and if its a subjective discussion then
its mostly about trade offs.
tere was a situation in my company where two engineers were discussing in a PR
review and didnt come to an agreement. I reached out to each individual
seperately and then understood the case, I then brough both of them a single
private slack room and told them to see the bugger picture and discuss trade
offs
1) which solution has more risks (one person)
2) whoch solution is preferred in the long run (one person)
at that point, we are 1 day to go to staging and the changes we are doing has
impacts that we dont know exactly how to test which is the main concern. So my
suggestion is to do it right for new client this version, create a ticket to go
and refactor other client to use this new model. He didn't agree and so i gave
him one day to prove me that he can safetly do this without breaking the other
thing. He reached out to get testcases and read the documentation to confirm if
this is good and during the tests, it broke one of the testcases and it was
getting close to staging cut off and so I told him to go with alternate
solution.

How do you handle situations of conflict in the workplace? You will inevitably face some of these at Apple - what methods have you found to be effective that you could apply here?

Did you come across this question in an interview?

Answers

Unlock Community Insights

Unlock Community Insights

Also asked as

Try Our AI Interviewer